How to avoid OTT on small phones

Since the beggining of the error of OTT tax, I discovered a simple way of helping those with small phones who couldn't use VPN!This technich is to avail those with small phones and had no mobile money access but needed to use Facebook. This simple technique can allow one to log to twitter,Facebook on opera,firefox,and all browsers. It also helps to log into Facebook on a mini Facebook lite app,and Instagram on Firefox and opera.Take a look at the screen shots on how to go about it in the settings.

o

This simple trick also works on symbian,BlackBerry and all chinese is

On Android you edit as in the screen shots below

I have many  tricks and you can change those settings in many ways onball sim networks

USA's FBI hacked the iPhone 11..I have always told you my fellow Africans that you cannot hide yourselves from the intelligence bodies like CIA,MOSSAD,MI15/16

In the past, Apple has repeatedly refused to unlock the iPhone for the FBI pleasing its fan base with the notion that it indeed has no secret backdoor to your smartphone. Yet, this sadly did not mean that the iPhone was unhackable.

In fact, there have been numerous instances including strange cases such as when a teenager hacked Apple twice. No massive black hat teams sitting behind a plethora of big screens, literally a teenager. 

Now, another incident is on the rise with it being reported that the FBI can unlock all iPhones using Graykey – a product of Grayshift, an Atlanta based company. Moreover, this is not the first time that the tool has been in the headlines for helping unlock any iPhone using brute force techniques.

As reported by Thomas Brewster from Forbes, a search warrant of a United States District Court for Ohio dated October 16 of last year confirms the use of such a device to obtain forensic data:

The iPhone in question was an 11 Pro Max belonging to Baras Ali Koch, a man alleged to have helped his brother escape the U.S following an arrest order using Baras’s passport. An alarming thing emerging from this is that it was expected that iOS 13 would finally guard against such attacks but alas, it doesn’t seem to get any better.

Graykey in function

What if the iPhone was already unlocked? To debunk this, Thomas reports that Forbes themselves confirmed from Koch’s lawyer, Ameer Mabjish, that the device was locked. Adding further, he stated that

“Koch had not given it to them nor did they force the defendant to use his face to unlock the phone via Face ID, as far as the lawyer was aware.” 

We also analyzed an application of a search warrant as shown below which clearly shows the suspect’s iPhone locked in an attachment within.

It is important to note though that the FBI is not the only government agency to possess such tech. Previously, the Immigration Customs and Enforcement Authority (ICE) has made hefty purchases in the past amounting to over $1.2 million.

This though poses another question, if the FBI can hack any iPhone in this way, why ask Apple for help? The reason is that Apple has been stepping up its efforts on the side such as introducing a USB restricted mode with iOS 12 which prevents tools like Graykey from working. Moreover, the tool would not be a success in all cases as certain measures can be taken to resist i

To start with, since a brute force technique is being used, you can start using longer digit passcodes instead of the more often used 4 digit ones. To put this in perspective, Caleb from PIA explains by stating that:

“It takes Graykey an average of 6.5 minutes to crack a four-digit passcode. For a six-digit passcode, the time needed is 11.1 hours on average. A 10 digit passcode, the maximum allowed, requires Graykey an average of 4629 days to average.”

However, we’re still wondering why Apple has failed to implement measures that resist tools like Graykey under normal conditions. Is it something intentional while maintaining a public stand to appease both governments and its users or is it a coincidence? What do you think? Let us know in the comment section.

Nevertheless, this is not the first time when Feds have unlocked an iPhone device without Apple’s help. In 2016, the FBI used Israel based firm CellebriteCellebrite to unlock the iPhone 5C device of San Bernardino suspected shooter

Clear view app can be used by police to get information about any cyber criminal by merely getting his or her photos

Clearview app is not for personal use but only for law enforcement authorities, the company emphasizes.

China has been for a long time the poster face of conducting mass surveillance on its citizens. This has been attributed to its use of advanced AI-powered algorithms being able to facially recognize anyone on the streets. Yet, it seems like it won’t be the only state to do so for long.

Recently, it has been revealed in an investigation by the New York Times that a startup named Clearview AI has developed a facial recognition app that allows anyone to snap a picture of a stranger anywhere and instantly learn about their name, address and any other details available online.

How it does this is no secret. By scrapping images available from social networking services like Facebook and YouTube, the company records number over 3 billion pictures, far more than the databases of law enforcement agencies such as the FBI which has over 641 million images of U.S Citizens comprising of passport and driver’s license photos. Therefore, it is no surprise that over 600 U.S law enforcement agencies like the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are already Clearview’s customers.

But the crucial question is, what are the implications of such a service being available? 

Firstly, it has been reported by The Times that the app has assisted in solving crimes ranging from minor misdemeanors like shoplifting to indictable offenses such as murder, sexual exploitation, and credit card fraud.

While this is a good thing, it needs to be realized that it could turn bad pretty quickly too. States could use it as a tool to monitor the lives of citizens at a very personal level. Additionally, since we cannot expect the tech to be 100% accurate, false positives can end up getting innocent people blamed for crimes they did not commit.

But that’s not all. Since one needs to upload photos to Clearview’s servers, who makes sure those photos are secure? We’ve seen billion-dollar companies suffering from breaches, what makes this small company bulletproof?

Moreover, currently, we’ve only seen a few cities like San Francisco banning the app with there being no federal law regulating their use. This is expected to change with their being a significant focus on making laws governing facial recognition as a result of increasing advocating for such.

As an example, several civil rights groups like the  American Civil Liberties Union have complained of such systems, primarily like those of Amazon stating,

“We demand that Amazon stop powering a government surveillance infrastructure that poses a grave threat to customers and communities across the country.” 

On the other hand, when it comes to the mass public, although the app is not available for them currently, it is highly probable that it will be in the near time. With this, we’ll see stalkers stepping up their game and a rise in cyberbullying.

However, not everyone is criticizing the startup. According to Detective Constable in the Sex Crimes Unit Canadian Law Enforcement,

“Clearview is hands-down the best thing that has happened to victim identification in the last 10 years. Within a week and a half of using Clearview, [we] made eight identifications of either victims or offenders through the use of this app "

To conclude, social media platforms must learn from this expose and work on finding ways to avert the scraping of their data on a large scale. If they do that, all of these apps will find it difficult to engage in such business. Meanwhile, if government agencies are going to indeed use it, they should at the very least urge the app’s management to take the strictest of security precautions.

Israel's NSO at a blame of spying again ,after the company spyware was used in tracking late kashoggi

A UN investigative report has accused the billion-dollar Israeli firm NSO Group of providing spyware to hack Amazon’s president Jeffery Bezos’s iPhone, and the hacker is none other than the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

For tho who don’t know, NSO Group is a secretive (not so much now) spyware firm known for making its client capable of conducting offensive-cyber activities. The group was once in the news after one of its employees allegedly stole the company’s secrets with the intention to sell it on the dark web.

The UN report, published Wednesday, claims that Saudi crown prince used malicious spyware developed by the NSO Group to hack Bezos’s phone and stole sensitive private data including his nude selfies.

According to the UN high commissioner for human rights, Bezos’s iPhone was hacked using NSO Group’s spyware Pegasus. The report states that the Pegasus-3 spyware was acquired by the Saudi Royal Guard in November.

It is worth noting that in 2016, NSO Group also made headlines for developing Pegasus, a spyware which in 2016 targeted iPhone devices making them vulnerable to government-sponsored attacks.

In a report published by Citizen Labs and Lookout Security, Pegasus spyware was caught targeting dissidents and activists including Ahmed Mansoor, a renowned human rights activist in UAE.

Reportedly, there was a brief exchange of messages between the Saudi crown prince and Bezos’s back in spring 2018 via WhatsApp. On May 1, 2018, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman sent Bezos’s a video file, which was likely infected with spyware. After the malicious code was executed, a huge amount of data was transferred from Bezos’s phone. 

WhatsApp conversation between MBS and Bezos (left) – Video message accused of carrying malware that hacked Bezos’s iPhone (Image credit: Motherboard/Vice)

The NSO Group has previously been accused of providing spyware to countries including Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Panama, and the Middle East for conducting cyberattacks against their adversaries. However, the company denied any involvement.

Nevertheless, this time around too, NSO Group has rejected the report’s claims and is apparently “shocked and appalled” by the news.

“We can say unequivocally that our technology was not used in this instance,” stated the NSO Group.

The timeline of Bezos’s phone hack is integral, claims the UN report, because around the same time the phones of two very close associates of late journalist Jamal Khashoggi were hacked using the same spyware. The UN has asked the US and other authorities to take notice and investigate the matter on an immediate basis.

Cyber security blunder lead to Private data of 56M Americans to be exposed from China as apparently taken from CheckPeople.com

Security lapses are quite common nowadays and should not come as a surprise. But, there’s a difference between security lapse and blunder, and the recent incident is purely an example of the latter.

According to The Register, a white hat hacker using the Twitter handle @Lynx0x00 identified a database hosting personal sensitive data of over 56.25 million Americans. The database was stored on a computer in China using an IP address located in the Eastern Chinese region Hangzhou. 

The NoSQL database is massive, according to the hacker as it contains roughly 22GB of private data, which includes sensitive information including past and present home addresses, real name, age, and relations as well as phone numbers. What’s worse is that the database is still available for public access without any authentication.

Upon further digging, it was identified that the computer was linked to the Internet via web hosting service facilitated by Alibaba. It can be termed as a grave security blunder because even researchers are perplexed regarding why the information was stored on a Chinese computer and made freely accessible to give spammers and extortionists a chance to exploit it.

The origins of the database are, however, identified. The data belongs to a Florida-based company CheckPeople.com.

This is the homepage 

This company offers an “easy-to-use platform” to help people find information about anyone from the real name, and phone number to relatives and even felonious records for a nominal fee. But, seems like you don’t need to visit this website and pay to get the desired information as the entire data is now stored and accessible on a Chinese computer

In a statement to The Register, CheckPeople is looking into the incident. 

“CheckPeople is unaware of any database of information hosted in China or through Alibaba. CheckPeople’s records are stored in the United States on secure servers. However, CheckPeople takes security issues very seriously and is investigating this matter,” the company said.

This, however, is not the first time when personal data of unsuspected users have been stored and exposed in such a manner. In fact, since 2017, personal details of millions of Americans have been leaked online including household-related data of 123 million individuals, 82 million citizens data in Elasticsearch breach and millions of SMS and personal information of millions of Americans in Microsoft Azure breach.

Fake phones,illégal simcards and un seriousness of Uganda communication commission,Uganda national bureau of standards,carelessness of telecom companies..are making the work of crime investigation too tidious

For a long Time,i have been writing about thé issue of phones and this illégal simcards.Recently i remember writing about thé massive entry of Fake phones with Fake IMEI.it is hard to believe thisbut from around late july to mid October,there was massive importation of such phones in eastafrica and central Africa.The issue of simcards is still a great problème,illegally registres simcards are still being sold by various simcards vendors of whom some are Known by people are selling registered simcards and thèse simcards are sold to non ugandans and those who are apparrently dubious.And m'y question still stands as: Does UCC know this?Do thèse Telecom compagnies know that it is illégal to do such?....Thé only thing i can advise Telecom companies is that thé selling of simcards must bé by well Known and registered people and UCC must also register such people.How do simcards get registered in names of other people? I suspectes two scenerios of which i conclusively proved one.These people who do this registering of simcards get thé of national identity cards of REAL owners and  register thème on multiple simcards decieving thème that thé process is slow or that network is slow,thé Real owners will think that they are repeating thé same process on thé sale simcards yet they are registering another simcards,which they later sell  as already registered simcards.Every one can fall prêy to this trick although it is mainly thé old people and illiterate one who do fall prêy to this trick.
We,you and the rest may be taking this to be a simple issue but it is a problem to security more especially in the cases and during the course of investigations.we have and many know of the various kidnaps of people,and worse of it all of innocent children.it is annoying how such people do call parents of kidnapped kids asking for ransom,recently you heard of a kid who was killed just because of ransom of I hear"200000" Uganda shillings.Yes,the police can track and get such numbers but imagine if such a number is registered in names of a person who did not know that his identity card  was with another phone number.This makes the work of criminal investigation more hard and taking slot of time.with these Fake phones with Fake IMEI,am still on my research and am about to get to a final conclusion. Please ,UCC ,Police and UNBS wake up and fight this nonsense....let us wake up! You are making the work of security agencies to tough,you are making investigation become too costly in terms of time and information gathering..

https://www.facebook.com/100001900354474/posts/3403447289728583/?app=fbl

A lot of fake phone entered African markets between September to December

Starting from mid September this year there has been entry of fake phones on the market in east and Central Africa. According  to research  I tentatively conducted on the boarders of DRC, Rwanda, Tanzania  and one report finding from a friend  in Burundi, a group of phones with the  "TYPE ALLOCATION CODE" of 35551517.....All the phone with  this TAC are fake. I have been wondering  if BABT(British approval board for telecommunications)  whose identifying number 35 is mostly  used by phones made in China and Middle Eas, is aware of such fake phones using their identification  number!
Chinese companies have gone an extra mile in the production of fake electronic  products. It is worth here to note that, I do not mean that all products from China are fake!  The issue of these fake phones on African markets are as result of a number of pronounced factors! !
One is corruption, most quality controlling organizations in Africa connive with some of the exporting companies to allow such fake products on our markets. This is very dangerous  to the environment. Most of these phone run on fake micro chips especially spreadtrum which cannot operate for a very long time, these phones also are with  weak PCBs, and in most cases such phones usually  do not last for more than 3months without technical issues. Am actually worried for in the next 10years,African governments will again be yearning  for loans to combat environmental hazards resulting from massive dumps  of these fake electronic  products.
There is another problem with chinese electronic  manufacturing companies, they seem to produce few genuine products, and then later flood the markets  with apparent similar but fake products  so as to cut the cost of production. I  think in China, there are other small  companies that seem to copy and imitate other technology  giants, and since they cannot afford market  and production terms and conditions, they simply manufacture cheap products,using cheap resources .
In Uganda, I can extend my appreciation  to UCC for setting  up a link for testing whether ones product is fake!but it is better for UCC to get tough  and force all phone exporting and importing companies to first test all their products.
https://www.ucc.co.ug/imei.php
Now you've  to look at this example... This phone in the picture below has an IMEI of another different phone model which is an itel2090 yet for it is another model

These are phones owned by innocent citizens, they do know!!!  So am warning UCC not  to use this information  to block their IMEIs, actually it is this UCC that should sit with UNBS to solve this and have them out of market ..!!!stop this bribery and help citizens, how do you allow such products on market, do you know the repercussions  behind all these fake products ! For God and my country 

There is another security flaw on Intel processors

Altering Intel’s CPU voltages and frequency directly in the operating system is a feature that many users appreciate as it allows them to use all those software-based utilities that aid in overclocking. Now, this feature may not be as secure as previously anticipated.
Recently a team of cybersecurity experts proved that this particular feature can be exploited by threat actors that can cause substantial damage by aiming to hijack Intel SGX. For those who don’t know, Intel SGX
is an extremely critical and hardware-isolated space on new models of Intel CPUs responsible for encrypting sensitive data for protecting it from being stolen in case the system gets compromised.
The research team comprised of six European members from the University of Birmingham, KU Leuven, and the Graz University of Technology. The attack technique is dubbed Plundervolt and classified as
CVE-2019-11157 .
According to the team’s findings, the attack exploits the modern processor’s frequency and voltage adjustment feature, by controlling it in a way to generate errors in the system’s memory through flipping bits. This attack affects almost all those Intel Core Processors that are SGX-enabled including the Skylake generation .
However, the technique was identified and reported to Intel in June 2019 and now that the company has fixed the issue, the findings have been disclosed to the public.
Yesterday, Intel released the BIOS and microcode updates for addressing the Plundervolt issue and 13 other medium to high vulnerabilities. The updates make locking voltage a part of the default setting in the BIOS. Therefore,, if SGX is disabled or the CPU voltage is locked at the default value, the system will be safe from any threat.
The findings were reported first by ZDNet. The report states that using the Plundervolt vulnerability, threat actors can easily access information such as AES encryption keys stored in the chip’s SGX Enclave. This enclave is not separate from CPU’s memory but is protected by software encryption.
Once its security is breached, attackers can extract data from the enclave at a much faster rate than the previous attacks like Spectre and Meltdown. The attack mechanism is quite similar to the concepts behind CLKscrew and VoltJockey attacks, as it alters SGX bits to create errors and uses them to recreate data via a side-channel observation method.
The attack works on Intel’s 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th-Gen Core processors as well as Xeon E3, v5, v6, E-2100 and E-2200, and doesn’t need host access with administrative or root privileges to be launched.
Yet, exploiting the vulnerability would have been tough if not impossible but it would need a combination of attacks and specify particular targets, claim the researchers. It is also noted that the attack cannot be launched in virtual environments, which means Intel’s data center customers are not at risk.

What the hell is wrong with these online currency mining companies

3 of the BitClub Network mining pool have been arrested on fraud charges for operating a Ponzi scheme that has taken a total of $722 Million USD ($1,059,754,488 AUD) from its investors.
In an indictment from the New Jersey district court (), 5 names in total appear on the document, however 2 of the names have been redacted. The 3 persons in question that are named on the document are Matthew Brent Goettsche, Jobadiah Sinclair Weeks and Joseph Frank Abel.
All 3 named persons have been charged with conspiracy to offer and sell unregistered securities, with only Goettsche and Weeks being charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. The 2 redacted persons named on the document are still at large so their names with remain under seal until they have been arrested.
Between April 2014 and December 2019, the scammers released false statistics of their hash rates and returns to convince people to buy shares and invest in their BitClub Network mining pool, and offered bonuses for finding more victims to invest into the scam.
The indictment document includes transcripts of the conversations where the scammers discussed in detail and planed the entire operation.
Currently the BitClub promotional website and mining pool websites are still online and operating, which has the potential to scam unwitting persons that stumble across the sites and sign up.