Thursday, January 30, 2025

Intelligence extracts from DRC diplomats.Is this the real reason why Tshisekedi ha refused to have talks with M23

 





The former President of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Joseph Kabila Kanambe, allegedly entered into a secret agreement with Paul Kagame to facilitate the looting of Congolese minerals in exchange for so-called peace and security in the Kivu region.


A dossier has now surfaced revealing the full extent of these dealings. Today, Minister of State of the DRC, Thérèse Kayikwamba Wagner, has arrived in Washington, D.C. for a two-day working visit with the Trump administration, which has been left shocked by the revelations.


THE SCANDALOUS AGREEMENT: A DEAL WITH RWANDA & M23


The Trump administration has reportedly been stunned by the details of an agreement between the Congolese government, led at the time by Joseph Kabila (born Hypolite Kanambe Kazemberere), and the CNDP, the precursor to the M23 movement—the same group that is waging war against the DRC today under the support of Rwanda.


This agreement, signed in 2013, is now being used as a pretext by Rwanda to demand formal dialogue between the DRC and the M23-AFC terrorist movement, despite its clear aim of destabilizing and fragmenting the DRC.


However, one of the most sinister elements of this deal—now coming to light—is that it was not merely about securing mineral wealth but part of a larger, long-term strategy to establish a Tutsi Hima Empire stretching from Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda, and Kivu, with plans to eventually take over Kenya, Tanzania, and Angola after the conquest of Congo.


The plan allegedly included the assassination of Burundi’s Hutu leadership, followed by the ethnic cleansing of non-Tutsi populations in Kivu, clearing the way for Tutsi dominance across the region.


---


Key Aspects of the 2013 Agreement


I. Loss of Congolese Sovereignty & Regional Autonomy


1. Decentralization of the M23’s power across all eastern provinces, effectively giving the terrorist group control over strategic regions.


2. Recognition of a "disaster zone" covering North Kivu, South Kivu, Ituri, Haut-Uélé, Maniema, and Tanganyika, cutting off Kinshasa’s control over these areas.


3. Granting fiscal and financial autonomy to M23, allowing them to directly control local economic and political management.


4. Creation of a "state within a state", stripping the Kinshasa government of its authority over the region.


---


II. Infiltration of the M23 into Security Structures


5. Integration of M23 rebels into the Congolese military and police, severely compromising national security.


6. M23 took over 43% of military command posts in North Kivu and 39% in South Kivu, giving them strategic military dominance.


7. Creation of a border police unit controlled by M23, ensuring the group’s dominance over key border regions.


8. Official recognition of M23 military and police ranks, granting legitimacy to known war criminals.


Consequences:


Infiltration & betrayal: M23 was able to access strategic military intelligence, weakening the FARDC (Congolese army).


Compromised national defense: Instead of neutralizing M23, the agreement legitimized and empowered them.


---


III. Administrative Colonization by M23


9. The agreement allowed M23 to appoint governors, mayors, territorial administrators, and security officials, placing key leadership positions under rebel control.


10. Provincial finances were handed over to M23, allowing the group to dictate financial policies in the region.


Consequences:


Rwandan indirect control over Eastern Congo: By infiltrating the administration, Rwanda gained political influence without direct military intervention.


Collapse of state authority: Local governance was controlled by an armed group rather than elected officials.


---


IV. A Two-Tiered Justice System: Amnesty for M23, Persecution of FARDC


11. Full amnesty was granted to M23 fighters, allowing war criminals to reintegrate into society unpunished.


12. Meanwhile, Congolese soldiers (FARDC) were prosecuted for defending their country against M23 rebels.


Consequences:


Criminals in power: Former rebels, some responsible for heinous war crimes, were reintegrated into the government and military.


Demoralization of the FARDC: The government punished its own soldiers while rewarding the enemy.


---


V. A Repeated Strategy: From CNDP to M23 to the Tutsi Empire Plan


13. The 2013 agreement was a continuation of the 2009 CNDP agreement, which similarly allowed Rwanda to infiltrate Congolese institutions.


14. Kigali’s consistent strategy: Use rebel groups to pressure Kinshasa into concessions, then restart conflicts when beneficial.


15. The larger goal: The agreement laid the foundation for a Tutsi Empire, extending beyond the DRC into Burundi, Uganda, Rwanda, and eventually Kenya, Tanzania, and Angola.


---


The Secret Plan: Establishing the Tutsi Hima Empire


16. Elimination of Burundi’s Hutu leadership: Rwanda and its allies allegedly plotted the assassination of key Hutu political figures in Burundi to ensure total Tutsi dominance.


17. Genocide in Kivu: The plan involved killing all non-Tutsi populations in Eastern Congo, establishing it as a base for further expansion.


18. A launchpad for regional conquest: Once Eastern Congo was under control, the Tutsi Empire would set its sights on Kenya, Tanzania, and Angola.


---


VI. The Aftermath & Consequences


19. Resurgence of M23: Instead of eliminating the threat, the agreements kept Rwanda’s proxy forces embedded within the Congolese state.


20. Crisis in Goma: The fall of Goma to M23 today is a direct result of these agreements.


21. Loss of Congolese sovereignty: The Tutsi Empire project threatens to permanently break apart the DRC, making way for Rwandan expansion.


---


Conclusion: A Strategic Disaster for the DRC


The 2013 agreement was not just a betrayal of Congolese sovereignty—it was part of a larger imperialist strategy aimed at erasing national borders to create a Tutsi Hima Empire.


The agreement did not bring peace but empowered Rwanda’s control over Eastern Congo, setting the stage for further regional conquests.


If the DRC continues making the same mistakes, it risks losing its eastern provinces permanently.


History is repeating itself with the ongoing M23 insurgency and the fall of Goma.


A new compromise would mean permanently losing Eastern Congo to foreign influence.


---


What the Congolese provides as a Solution


The Democratic Republic of Congo must reject all negotiations that undermine its sovereignty and instead focus on regaining control of its territory through military and political strength.


If action is not taken, the dream of a Tutsi Empire stretching across Central and East Africa may soon become reality, at the expense of millions of innocent lives and the territorial integrity of sovereign nations.

.....Extract........

Monday, January 27, 2025

Message from the DRC Government Spokesperson



DRC: In view of the security situation in the city of Goma marked by the presence of the Rwandan army, we wish to reassure the population that following the instructions of the President of the Republic, the Government continues to work to avoid carnage and loss of human life in view of Rwanda's clear intentions.


We recommend that the population of Goma follow the following measures:


1) Stay safe, at home;


2) Refrain from committing acts of vandalism and looting;


3) Block the road to Rwanda's manipulative propaganda.


We call on all Congolese, wherever they are in the world, to mobilize in support of our compatriots in North Kivu, our FARDC and the Supreme Commander.


We are all guardians of our territory!!!!


Not a single centimeter will be given up!!!



Sunday, January 26, 2025

What has DRC said?

 


What is the gorvenment of Rwanda saying?


 

MONUSCO relocates som of its staff as security in GOMA worsens

 

Faced with the deterioration of the security situation in North Kivu and particularly around the city of Goma, MONUSCO announced this Saturday the temporary relocation of its non-essential personnel from Goma. This decision aims to ensure the safety of employees while maintaining essential humanitarian operations in the city.


According to MONUSCO, while this measure could suggest a withdrawal, it is in reality a strategic adaptation. The personnel essential to the continuity of operations, particularly in the areas of humanitarian aid and the protection of civilians, will remain on the ground. The United Nations is thus reaffirming its unwavering commitment to the populations of North Kivu, who are particularly vulnerable in the face of the crisis.


The deterioration of the security situation in North Kivu, marked by an upsurge in violence and population displacement following the M23-RDF war, has forced the UN to take this difficult decision. The temporary relocation of non-essential staff helps minimize the risks incurred by employees while ensuring the continuation of vital activities on the ground, MONUSCO sources learned. 


"This measure will not impact the provision of humanitarian assistance to the most vulnerable populations. The UN will continue to ensure the distribution of food, medicines, and provide support in terms of shelter and protection. Humanitarian teams present on the ground will work closely with national authorities and humanitarian partners to respond to urgent needs," a MONUSCO source said.


Despite this difficult context, the UN reiterates its commitment to supporting peace, stability and development in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This organization reassures that it will continue to work alongside the Congolese authorities and civil society to find lasting solutions to this complex humanitarian crisis

M23 officers in uvira