the F35 is a turd with wings...?
Its not like the General Accounting Office (GAO) created a report citing "111 Category 1 and 855 Category 2 deficiencies". . .
Its not like it will 'fall out of the sky' if it is disconnected from Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) for a short amount of time. . .
It is not like the F35B variant 'shook apart under stress-testing' and has to have its tyres changed in less than 10 landings. . .
Its not like the guns on the F35 are "consistently missing ground targets" and are showing a bias “long, and to the right”. . .
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was supposed to be four times more effective than older, legacy fighters in air-to-air combat, Eight times more effective in air-to-ground combat, And three times better at reconnaissance and suppression of enemy air defences.
All 3 versions of the F35 (A, B & C) are zesty yellow turds. Not only has the project extremely over promised and extremely under delivered, The F35 program is the most expensive undertaking by the US government. In 2012 the project had already cost $320 Billion (USD) and in 2014 it was estimated to "have operating costs 79 percent higher than the aircraft it was to replace". There are so many better things that you can operate for between $25,000 and $35,000 USD per hour.
It is such a heap of shit, That it cannot out manoeuvre or out fly the 20 year old fighter that it is supposed to replace. In fact, Not only is it a physical heap of shit, I would hate to see all of the security vulnerabilities that this 'winged disaster' has, let alone all of the data that is going to be collected by Lockheed Martin via (ALIS & any 'man in the middle').
Lockheed Martin's excuse is that the F35 is so 'selthy' that it doesn't need to out fly the enemy, because it will 'sneak up undetected and kill them first'. YEAH, GOOD LUCK WITH THAT. . .
After all of that, Australia is committed to purchase 72 of these flying shit sandwiches, Too bad Australian Consumer Law (ACL) does not apply in this case. . . They are no where near 'As described and without defects'
Its not like the General Accounting Office (GAO) created a report citing "111 Category 1 and 855 Category 2 deficiencies". . .
Its not like it will 'fall out of the sky' if it is disconnected from Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) for a short amount of time. . .
It is not like the F35B variant 'shook apart under stress-testing' and has to have its tyres changed in less than 10 landings. . .
Its not like the guns on the F35 are "consistently missing ground targets" and are showing a bias “long, and to the right”. . .
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was supposed to be four times more effective than older, legacy fighters in air-to-air combat, Eight times more effective in air-to-ground combat, And three times better at reconnaissance and suppression of enemy air defences.
All 3 versions of the F35 (A, B & C) are zesty yellow turds. Not only has the project extremely over promised and extremely under delivered, The F35 program is the most expensive undertaking by the US government. In 2012 the project had already cost $320 Billion (USD) and in 2014 it was estimated to "have operating costs 79 percent higher than the aircraft it was to replace". There are so many better things that you can operate for between $25,000 and $35,000 USD per hour.
It is such a heap of shit, That it cannot out manoeuvre or out fly the 20 year old fighter that it is supposed to replace. In fact, Not only is it a physical heap of shit, I would hate to see all of the security vulnerabilities that this 'winged disaster' has, let alone all of the data that is going to be collected by Lockheed Martin via (ALIS & any 'man in the middle').
Lockheed Martin's excuse is that the F35 is so 'selthy' that it doesn't need to out fly the enemy, because it will 'sneak up undetected and kill them first'. YEAH, GOOD LUCK WITH THAT. . .
After all of that, Australia is committed to purchase 72 of these flying shit sandwiches, Too bad Australian Consumer Law (ACL) does not apply in this case. . . They are no where near 'As described and without defects'
No comments:
Post a Comment